The Madness of Melanie Phillips

So, Dr Andrew Wakefield is now just plain old Andrew Wakefield after being struck off for – in the words of the Telegraph’s Tom Chivers:

[being] one of the principal authors of perhaps the stupidest and most unnecessary health scare of recent Western history… [and] for being “dishonest”, “misleading” and “irresponsible” in his research into the MMR vaccine and its purported links to autism.

If you want a wonderful comic-book account of the whole affair then go here and read this wonderful summary – pay close attention to the role that the media played in hyping up the non-existent link and making measles commonplace once again.

If you’re aware of this story then you’ll be aware of just how completely discredited both Wakefield and his ‘research’ is. You’d also probably expect an author of a book titled ‘The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth, and Power’ which is supposedly about our irrationality:

In what we tell ourselves is an age of reason, we are behaving increasingly irrationally. An astonishing number of people subscribe to celebrity endorsed cults, Mayan armageddon prophecies, scientism, and other varieties of new age, anti-enlightenment philosophies. Millions more advance popular conspiracy theories: AIDS was created in a CIA laboratory, Princess Diana was assassinated, and the 9/11 attacks were an inside job.

To be glad that rationality has won the day and Andrew Wakefield has been struck off. However, you then realise that the author of the above book is Melanie Phillips, and she is – for want of a better phrase – absolutely batshit insane. For starters, her book seeks to blame irrationality on:

the slow but steady marginalization of religion. We tell ourselves that faith and reason are incompatible, but the opposite is the case. It was Christianity and the Hebrew Bible, Phillips asserts, that gave us our concepts of reason, progress, and an orderly world on which science and modernity are based.

And that:

Without its religious traditions, the West has drifted into mass derangement where truth and lies, right and wrong, victim and aggressor are all turned upside down. Scientists skeptical of global warming are hounded from their posts, Israel is demonized, and the US is vilified over the war on terror—all on the basis of blatant falsehoods and obscene propaganda.

One imagines that Melanie Phillip’s arguments are undermined somewhat for her track record of drawing vastly different conclusions from the witnessing of any event. Her verdict on Andrew Wakefield being struck off is this short statement utterly bereft of any relationship to reality:

Following the risible kangaroo court set up by the General Medical Council Andrew Wakefield, the doctor at the heart of the MMR controversy, has now been struck off the medical register while his colleagues have yet to learn their own fate. This is a tragedy and a travesty. I believe a monstrous injustice has been done here, which has crucified the one doctor who tried to alleviate and prevent the suffering of a particular group of children and which has also betrayed their parents. The full story of how this sinister travesty was accomplished and the full range of people who were complicit in it — along with what it means for both medicine and public safety — has yet to be revealed. Over time, I hope this will eventually be achieved.

I’d suggest after reading the above statement we could all be justifiably skeptical that Melanie Phillips has anything rational to add to the topics of global warming, Israel and the war on terror. The worst thing is that this isn’t out of character for Melanie at all, she has a proud record of arguing ridiculous points.

Like, for example, claiming that the BBC’s decision to sack Carol Thatcher for her racist remark was:

a chilling insight into the totalitarian universe of the closed BBC mind… If the BBC had intended to convince the public that it had departed altogether from reality and common sense and resided instead in some alternative Stalinist universe, it could hardly have done a better job

Or, for example, claiming that a 13 year old father (who turned out in the end not to even be the father):

vividly reveals how our children are being abandoned and betrayed… And we all know why this is. A sexual free-for-all legitimated by the mantra of ‘lifestyle choice’, promoted from the top by narcissistic liberals and funded at the bottom by welfare benefits, has caused a catastrophic rate of family breakdown and fragmentation which is now repeating itself in an endless generational cycle

Or, for example, claiming that the increased deposits in sharia banking in the UK means that those banks accepting deposits are:

effectively endors[ing] the extremist ideology behind it of conquering the west for Islam

Or, for example, claiming that recent teenage pregnancy figures are evidence (even though with one odd exception teenage pregnancy rates are falling year-on-year) that:

Labour is doing nothing less than trying to reshape the sexual and moral behaviour of an entire society

Or, for example, equating a nurse being suspended for praying at work and a ‘private remark’ (what, it never left the confines of her head?) made by Carol Thatcher being reported with the UK:

sliding inexorably into a culture of control which would have been very familiar to the Stasi or the KGB

Or, for example, how turning away a slightly batty Dutch MP was a sign that Britain is:

sleepwalking towards cultural suicide… If anyone had doubted the extent to which Britain has capitulated to Islamic terror, the banning of Geert Wilders should surely open their eyes

If, after all this, you still think Melanie Phillips has anything sane or rational to add to any debate, then I’d politely suggest that you’re a bit mad as well.

5 Comments

  1. Mr Larrington
    Posted May 26, 2010 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    “A sexual free-for-all legitimated by the mantra of ‘lifestyle choice’”

    …because, after all, the Daily Mail would never do anything like publish pictures of a bikini-clad Miley Cyrus, oh, er.

    as you were.

  2. Daniel
    Posted May 26, 2010 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    I can’t comprehend the support for Wakefield that seems to come from some sections of the media. For the parents of children with autism, it’s understandable. I can’t fathom the anguish that parents of autistic children must suffer. Autism is still greatly misunderstood; both scientifically and socially. It’s natural that a parent of a child with autism will desperately look for the cause — why is their child the way they are?

    When overcome with emotion, it’s easy to leave logic at the door in one’s search for reason. It’s easy for those with a personal experience of autism to look the other way when it comes to Wakefield’s unethical research methods and the fact that he was on the payroll of legal entities with more than a vested interest in prosecuting pharmaceutical companies. However, how can Melanie Phillips, and others of her ilk who seemingly have no personal attachment to the cause, support Wakefield in light of the overwhelming evidence against him? Phillips is validating the kind of hysteria and conspiracy theory that she so adamantly derides in her book.

  3. Sally Wilkins
    Posted May 26, 2010 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    I am the parent of a severely autistic young man. I think Andrew Wakefield is a dangerous and unethical menace. Not every parent of an autistic child is thick enough to believe that Someone Is To Blame and Someone Must Be Punished. Accidents, including genetic ones, happen, and it’s long been recorded that the classic pattern with autism is for the child to develop apparently normally till about 15 months – coincidentally the age at which MMR is usually given – and then to regress. Many parents of autistic children are perfectly able to grasp that post hoc does not necessarily equate to propter hoc. The problem is that they are not the ones who parade around with banners and grab the headlines.

  4. Daniel
    Posted May 26, 2010 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    Sally, of course I don’t believe that all parents of autistic children would be supportive of Andrew Wakefield. I was merely pointing out that when presented with the apparent cause of their child’s condition by a doctor claiming to be acting in the best interests of autistic children, it is understandable that they would believe him. It’s human nature to look for reason and for some, all the pieces fit. Their child receieved the MMR vaccine, their child began showing symptoms of autism. Others, such as yourself (and hopefully the vast majority), recognise the coincidences and leaps of logic in Wakefield’s study. If anything, those parents who were duped by Wakefield have been manipulated as much as their children.

    The emotional investment of the parents who Wakefield did manage to fool doesn’t justify their support of him; but it may go some way to explaining it. However, I can’t comprehend why people such as Melanie Phillips (who as far as I’m aware, has no personal connection to autism) upholding Wakefield’s position.

  5. Sally Wilkins
    Posted May 27, 2010 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Daniel, I understand perfectly what you are saying. I just get very fed up with the lazy tabloid assumption that all parents of autistic children are the same and think the same way.

    For those who do think this way, I think the motivation is:

    1. the Holy Grail of compensation if AW had been proved right;
    2. the inability to grasp the concept of accident as opposed to Someone Is To Blame And Will Pay;
    and 3. and most importantly, the fact that if you believe someone is to blame, the urgent need is to make that person someone other than oneself. It is fairly obvious to anyone with any logical capabilities that if two parents have each contributed half the genes to a child, then it’s quite difficult to get away from the conclusion that between you you produced an imperfect child. BUT if you can convince yourself that YOU had a perfect baby and somebody then wilfully injured it, you absolve yourself from the burden of guilt that is inevitable if you subscribe to the tabloid belief that there is no such thing as a genuine accident. You can then cast yourself as an avenging angel on behalf of your wilfully-damaged child and you can worship at the feet of the saint who revealed all to you and whose saintliness is being proved by his martyrdom at the hands of unbelievers.

    Phew.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
*

28 Trackbacks / Tweetbacks

  1. By blacflag (ally ) on May 25, 2010 at 10:30 pm

    RT @uponnothing: New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  2. By dnotice (Gareth Winchester) on May 25, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    RT @uponnothing: New Post: The Madness of #MelaniePhillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL <- Possibly redundant title, but accurate

  3. By audm (audreym) on May 25, 2010 at 10:35 pm

    RT @uponnothing: New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  4. By 5ChinCrack (5 Chinese Crackers) on May 25, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  5. By Ogrizovic (Ogrizovic) on May 25, 2010 at 10:57 pm

    RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL /via @5chincrack

  6. By timdungate (Tim Dungate) on May 25, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    RTing for great justice. Melanie Phillips is a travesty. @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  7. By gregeden (Greg Eden) on May 25, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    RT @uponnothing: New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL #fb

  8. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gareth Winchester, Kevin Arscott, Ogrizovic, audreym, 5 Chinese Crackers and others. 5 Chinese Crackers said: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL [...]

  9. By antonvowl (antonvowl) on May 26, 2010 at 7:32 am

    RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  10. By cloblog (Chloe Setter) on May 26, 2010 at 7:40 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  11. By vogelbeere (Angharad Wyvern) on May 26, 2010 at 7:43 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  12. By Julaybib (Yakoub Islam) on May 26, 2010 at 7:47 am

    New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL RT@uponnothing

  13. By benjrooney (Ben Rooney) on May 26, 2010 at 7:52 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL < marvelous stuff

  14. By meganclareprice (Megan Price) on May 26, 2010 at 7:56 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  15. By rpcompaneros (Paul) on May 26, 2010 at 7:56 am

    New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL (via @uponnothing) << Melanie Phillips? Similar to the Stasi??!

  16. By unslugged (unslugged) on May 26, 2010 at 7:58 am

    Great post >> RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  17. By zulfiqarahmed (zulfiqarahmed) on May 26, 2010 at 8:02 am

    RT @unslugged: Great post >> RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  18. By thabet1979 (thabet) on May 26, 2010 at 8:08 am

    RT @uponnothing: New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  19. By cripesonfriday (Martin ) on May 26, 2010 at 8:10 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  20. By Lorelei_ (Kim Lofthouse) on May 26, 2010 at 8:59 am

    So many reasons why Melanie Phillips should be ignored by anyone with even half a brain cell – http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  21. By ThegoodBuck (Buck Thomas) on May 26, 2010 at 9:17 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL<

  22. By wishingstar342 (Dee Pinheiro) on May 26, 2010 at 9:51 am

    RT @uponnothing: New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  23. By LaurenJJones (Lauren Jones) on May 26, 2010 at 9:54 am

    RT @antonvowl: RT @uponnothing New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  24. By mattlodder (Matt Lodder) on May 26, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    RT @uponnothing: Cheeky RT New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  25. By Schroedinger99 (Mike Ward) on May 26, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    RT @uponnothing: Cheeky RT New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  26. By polfret (Martin Coxall) on May 26, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    RT @uponnothing: Cheeky RT New Post: The Madness of Melanie Phillips. http://bit.ly/c5vdsL

  27. [...] and employs a cavalcade of pretty much the worst sort of hack columnists – people like MelaniePhillips, Jan Moir, and the irrepressable Richard Littlejohn, whose entire column seems to be the [...]

  28. By Declining standards | Kick A Hole In The Sky on September 11, 2010 at 9:00 am

    [...] sessions for Mr Littlejohn. Perhaps a school nurse might even be persuaded to take a look at Melanie Phillips. It may be drastic, but this seems to be the only way to save Britain’s best-loved chip [...]

Your Ad Here